Big data is starting to get
interesting or scary depending on how you look at it. Sal Thomas writes in
on-line “Marketing” this week about B and Q which is testing electronic price tagging i.e.
altering the price of an item based on the profile of the customer. Basically the system uses data stored from
loyalty cards and spending habits then uses chips in customers’ mobile phones to
work out a price to be displayed next to the goods on a shelf. This apparently is being “sold” as a way of
rewarding loyal shoppers but the reality is more likely to be “price
optimisation” for the retailer. “Smart shelves” are
already being trialled (e.g. Tesco) so the question Sal Thomas asks is “when
does dynamic pricing risk turning personalisation into discrimination?”
It is
going to be a difficult ethical call for businesses as they compete for, and
manipulate, customer data in more complex ways.
These companies could do with taking time out to look at the bigger picture re
building sustainable customer trust and keep asking themselves, “just because we
can doesn’t mean we should” use the data in these ways. Uber in the US for
example showed a lack of ethical judgement when it increased prices
dramatically during a snow storm in New York resulting in extensive public
criticism (and resulting in official price curbing in emergency
situations). It would be interesting to
think about what would have happened in customer loyalty and trust terms if
they’d done the exact opposite and showed a genuine interest in customers’
well-being during times of crisis. Until the cultural mind-set of business shifts
genuinely towards the customer big data will surely continue to be weighted to
exploitation not reward?
No comments:
Post a Comment