Thursday 19 February 2015

It’s not so bright treating rent-to-buy customers unfairly



Is there a responsibility to protect vulnerable customers from potentially misleading terms and conditions?  There certainly was in the pay day loan market where regulation was introduced to stop companies exploiting the poorest members of society.  Now the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Debt and Personal Finance has written to the Financial Conduct Authority about rent-to-own (RTO) retailers such as BrightHouse ‘cashing in’ on consumers’ difficulties.  The Group make 20 recommendations to be used as a new blueprint for the sector.  Key proposals include: 

  • a ban on warranties and insurance
  • an investigation into the mis-selling of insurance
  • safeguards to prevent customers losing essential items for which they have already made substantial payments
  • transparency about the total cost of RTO agreements

One of the business benefits of ethical conduct is it reduces the risk/cost of regulatory action. Yet again it really isn't too bright in the long-term to treat customers unfairly.

No comments:

Post a Comment